The South Korean-designed jets arrived at a very critical juncture for the ageing air force. With the retirement of the Soviet-era MiG-29N Fulcrum and the decimation of both the Hawk 108 and 208 series fleets through operational attrition and crashes, the RMAF's combat capabilities have been severely curtailed. The loss of a very precious F/A-18D Hornet in 2025 was particularly keenly felt.
But the arrival of the FA-50M is not a fix-all solution. To a certain extent, it is a stop-gap measure. Here is why.
Before the FA-50M, the RMAF operated a hodgepodge of combat aircraft from three countries: the United States (F/A-18D Hornet), the United Kingdom (BAe Hawk 108 and 208), and Russia (Su-30MKM). That's three different logistical supply chains.
With Russia currently embroiled in the war in Ukraine and facing heavy sanctions, alternative supply chains had to be established, including one through India. China is also rumoured to be part of the supply chain for the RMAF's Su-30MKM fleet.
Add in the other wings of the air force (rotary, transport, and training), and you will have France and Italy in the mix. With the FA-50M, we will need to establish yet another logistical supply chain, this time with South Korea.
In terms of capabilities, the FA-50M is classified as a Light Combat Aircraft (LCA). It does not fall within the classification of the Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) that we have often been fed with over the last two decades. Thus, to some, it is seen as a downgrade.
Indeed, the FA-50M procurement programme was designed as a replacement for the Hawks. However, some of us, myself included, see the programme as an opportunity to fill the capability gap left by the MiG-29N, which is classified as an air-superiority fighter.
Regionally, the FA-50M is not a good benchmark against our neighbours' procurement programmes. Singapore is part of the F-35 programme, which involves a fifth-generation fighter. Indonesia has procured the French Rafale, a fourth-generation MRCA (though it must be said that Indonesia would have an even crazier logistical nightmare compared to us).
Whenever we compare our procurement programmes against those of our neighbours, detractors often roll their eyes in exasperation and point out that we should not be engaged in an arms race. They might add, "Do not covet thy neighbour's new car" (in our case, jets).
As much as I understand their rationale and stance, and hope that they are right, two of our neighbours have coveted parts of our country. Indonesia launched the failed Ganyang Malaysia campaign, which ultimately led to Indonesia's founding president, Soekarno, being deposed. Meanwhile, the Philippines' Oplan Merdeka under Ferdinand Marcos backfired, resulting in the Jabedah massacre, which triggered the Moro uprising.
But Malaysia being Malaysia, the government, irrespective of whichever administration is in power, has always downplayed these geopolitical threats. Indeed, even at the height of China Coast Guard (CCG) incursions into our Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs), the situation is often downplayed and "solved" through the submission of diplomatic notes. You might even think that diplomacy was first founded in Malaysia.
Even the Indonesia-Malaysia Konfrontasi, which resulted from the Ganyang Malaysia campaign, was seen as just a confrontation, despite the shooting war.
Despite what might seem to be my misgivings about the procurement of the FA-50M, which I have aired above, I still see it as an opportunity for the RMAF to return to its former glory.
Should the FA-50M's performance prove satisfactory, the RMAF should press for the next batch. The high number of jets would theoretically reduce the operational cost per unit. Each aircraft would also get more rotation, allowing them to last longer.
Caveat emptor: no wars that would lead to their attrition.
Secondly, the FA-50M presents an opportunity for the RMAF to streamline its logistics. As the older jets are retired due to operational obsolescence and attrition, their respective supply chains can be closed.
Thirdly, with a sufficient number of aircraft (which I must emphasise in this parenthesis), the RMAF will be able to return to its roots.
In a way, while the FA-50M is supposed to replace the MiG-29N and the Hawks, the MiG-29N filled the space vacated by the F-5E II Fighting Tigers, though not in the sense of a one-to-one replacement. In terms of operational design philosophy, the FA-50M was intended to fill the space left behind by the Tigers.
The US had originally designed the F-5E as a lead-fighter programme for US-friendly nations, with the USAF getting the F-16s. However, US-friendly nations increasingly preferred to acquire the F-16 Falcons, skipping the Tigers altogether and ultimately killing the F-20 Tiger programme.
That said, the Turkish Hürjet programme may be interesting. While South Korea is not the US, the FA-50M does have much of its technological roots in the US. A US-imposed sanction, regardless of the reason, could still kill the FA-50M.
I have ranted enough. But, as always, do recheck my information, as my views may or may not be accurate. The interpretation, I leave to you.
(Note: I am getting lazier about doing that for you. And even if I do, you might still deem it invalid. You have your cake; I have mine.)
No comments:
Post a Comment